top of page

The Case of the Missing Audience: Who Are We Even Talking To in Water and Climate?

  • sumbulmashhadi055
  • Sep 11
  • 2 min read

Updated: 21 hours ago

Ever read a water, energy, waste management, or sustainability report and thought, “Wait… who was this written for? Other climate science nerds? The author’s PhD advisor?” Because let’s be honest: too often, our communication sounds like we are writing for ourselves.


The result? The public tunes out, decision-makers glaze over, and your neighbor still thinks “aquifer” is a new yoga move.


When Good Water and Climate Comms Go Bad


Examples are everywhere:


  • A technical report released with no summary, no visuals, no story. Spoiler: nobody reads it.

  • Campaigns plastered with phrases like “multi-stakeholder basin governance platforms.” Great, but what does that mean to someone just trying to keep water in their taps?

  • Posters about waste management that use bar charts so tiny they require a microscope.

Meanwhile, when someone frames it well? Boom. It sticks.

  • Coca-Cola India Foundation’s Refreshing Difference video series in Rajasthan under the “When the villagers became the voice of the campaign” theme. It skipped celebrity gloss and let locals narrate how reviving ponds, check dams, and groundwater recharge changed lives.

  • Water Footprint Network’s viral stat, “a cotton T-shirt takes 2,700 liters of water to produce” connected water and climate to something hanging in everyone’s closet.

  • WaterAid India’s Jal Champions campaign made water conservation feel personal, recruiting more than 21,000 grassroots champions to spread the message in schools and communities.


The Tone-Deaf Zone


Most organizations don’t mean to alienate people. They just… forget who they are talking to. Writing for policy peers? Fine. But if the goal is public awareness, why does your press release sound like an academic journal?


Imagine telling your friend:

You: “We are leveraging multi-stakeholder platforms to advance basin-level governance frameworks.”
Your friend: “Cool… dinner at 7 tonight?”

The Research Backs It


The Yale Program on Climate Change Communication has shown for years that the public isn’t one big audience, it’s many. They identify “Six Americas” of climate audiences, ranging from the “Alarmed” to the “Dismissive.” Each group needs a different frame, tone, and entry point (Yale Climate Comms).


Translation: if you talk to everyone like they are policy wonks, you lose most of them. The same goes for water and climate: the audience matters as much as the message.


How to Find the Audience (And Keep Them)


  1. Pick a lane: Are you writing for policymakers, farmers, teenagers, or funders? You can’t speak to them all the same way.

  2. Translate the science: Instead of “aquifer recharge,” try “refilling underground water tanks.”

  3. Use stories over stats: People don’t remember 17% efficiency gains. They remember the farmer who saved his crops.

  4. Test it out: If your neighbor says, “That’s neat,” you’re good. If they say, “What’s a basin governance platform?” Try again!


Conclusion


If we want water and climate communication to work, we need to stop writing for ourselves and start writing for humans. Because the goal isn’t to impress our peers, it’s to get people to care, to act, and to change things.


Next time before you hit publish, ask: “Would my cousin understand this?” If the answer is no, congratulations! You have just solved the case of the missing audience.

Comments


bottom of page